|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Literature Review:
|
Point of InterestIn the January 2008 issue of Pediatric Anesthesia there were several articles devoted to pediatric sedation. The issue includes a report on the development of national guidelines for sedation in Scotland. The information on these guidelines was presented as a short article in this issue – entitled SIGN guideline 58: safe sedation of children undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatric Anesthesia Volume 18 Issue 1 Page 11-12 January 2008. The full guideline, references and supporting documentation is available at http://www.sign.ac.uk or at http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign58.pdf) According to the short article these guidelines were intended to answer the key questions as to:
Apparently the definitions used for sedation levels used in developing the Scottish documents were identical to those used in the AAP guidelines however no agreement was reached with the dentists in Scotland – so they are not included in this guideline. The guideline is extensive and includes chapters on prepartation, techniques, provider requirements etc. We have to applaud the idea of coming up with national standards and guidelines – as well as the supporting materials that are included in these guidelines. It may well represent a template for the future development of a standard approach to sedation delivery in the USA (building on the work that has gone into the AAP guidelines). On the other hand, a quick viewing of the materials in this website points out some of the clear differences in practice between Scotland and (at least) the USA. For instance – the guideline recommends general anesthesia for all GI procedures in children and general anesthesia for painful oncology procedures in children. Once again we find the idea of evidence based national guideline development (that are as extensive as these) to be interesting – and will not quibble with the details of the recommendations themselves. They are worth viewing. The same January Pediatric Anesthesia Issue includes several additional articles on sedation that we reserve the right to review in future issues of the newsletter. They include: Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update Conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry. A short review of the current UK guidelines and the technique of inhalational sedation with nitrous oxide Deep sedation and minimal anesthesia Ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric emergency medicine: a UK perspective Training and credentialing in procedural sedation and analgesia in children: lessons from the United States model Investigating the pharmacodynamics of ketamine in children Propofol–ketamine vs propofol–fentanyl combinations for deep sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing burn dressing changesa Sedation with ketamine and low-dose midazolam for short-term procedures requiring pharyngeal manipulation in young children Effect of propofol on emergence behavior in children after sevoflurane general anesthesia Thanks and please send your comments and questions to Joseph Cravero, MD. |
Editors: Departments of Anesthesiology Circulation
|
© COPYRIGHT 2008 SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC SEDATION • 2209 DICKENS RD., RICHMOND, VA 23230-2005 (804) 565-6354 • Fax: (804) 282-0090 • www.pedsedation.org |